Search the Atlas

Search risks, controls, and glossary terms

Non-AgenticSecurity

Access Control

Explanation

Access control checks that only authorised users, services and processes can reach the AI system and the sensitive financial data it touches — for example the documents and embeddings behind a retrieval-augmented (RAG) assistant that may contain customer PII, account balances or KYC records. It matters because weak access control is a primary route to data breaches and regulatory penalties in banking. It is measured by the Access Violation Rate, computed as Violation Rate = Count(Unauthorized_Access_Attempts) / Count(Total_Access_Attempts) for systems handling financial data, so it tracks the share of access attempts that were not permitted. To implement and operate it, enforce least-privilege role-based or attribute-based access at every layer — API gateway, retrieval store, model endpoint and admin consoles — with strong authentication, and emit an immutable audit log of every access attempt recording identity, resource, decision (allow/deny) and timestamp; feed denied attempts into a security monitoring pipeline for alerting. The threshold is <0.1% with 100% investigation of violations: the unauthorized-attempt rate must stay below one in a thousand, and every single violation, regardless of rate, must be investigated. A breach of the rate or any uninvestigated violation is an immediate-priority event that triggers incident response, access review and potential credential revocation.

Metric calculation

Violation Rate = Count(Unauthorized_Access_Attempts) / Count(Total_Access_Attempts) For systems handling financial data.

Risks mitigated

27
ZYR-TR-001High
Unauthorised Tool Invocation
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-002High
Critical Action Risk
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-003High
Unsafe Tool Composition
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-004High
Third-Party Blast Radius
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-005High
Plugin & Dependency Integrity Failure
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-008High
Arbitrary Code Execution via Agent
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-009Medium
Resource Exhaustion via Agent
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-MA-001High
Coordinated Multi-Agent Harm
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-002High
Cross-Agent Capability Bypass
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-003Medium
Coordinated AI-Driven Manipulation
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-004Medium
Agents as Attack Surfaces
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-005High
Failure Propagation Across Agent Pipeline
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-006Low
Steganographic & Covert Agent Communication
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-007Critical
A2A Trust Exploitation
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-008High
Cross-System Agent Traversal
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-009Low
Negative Externality Coordination
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-MA-010High
Shared Foundation Model Failures
Multi-Agent Security
ZYR-SI-001High
Agent Impersonation
Security & Identity
ZYR-SI-002Critical
External Goal Manipulation
Security & Identity
ZYR-SI-005Medium
Attack Surface Enumeration
Security & Identity
ZYR-SI-006High
Configuration-Embedded Credential Extraction
Security & Identity
ZYR-SI-007High
Social Engineering via AI
Security & Identity
ZYR-TR-010Critical
MCP Tool Description Poisoning (TPA-D)
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-011Medium
Cross-Server Tool Composition
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-TR-012High
MCP Marketplace Compromise (Typo-Squatting · Shadowing · Rug-Pull)
Tool & Affordance Risk
ZYR-SI-008Critical
MCP Resource & Prompt Primitive Injection
Security & Identity
ZYR-SI-009Medium
MCP Transport-Layer Exploitation
Security & Identity